Vendor — sole-source deep dive
Per-year, per-ministry breakdown of this vendor's sole-source contract dollars.
Verbatim from Alberta Open Data. Where the upstream published no work description or sole-source justification code, the field renders as —.
| Amount | Ministry | FY | Period | Work description | NSC code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $19,883 | CHILDREN'S SERVICES | 2019-2020 | 2019-04-01 → 2020-03-31 | Supports & Services for Youth | d |
| $19,833 | CHILDREN'S SERVICES | 2018-2019 | 2018-04-01 → 2019-03-31 | Community-Based Living and Supports | d |
| $17,000 | CHILDREN'S SERVICES | 2017-2018 | 2017-04-01 → 2018-03-31 | Aboriginal Supports | d |
| $12,750 | HUMAN SERVICES | 2016-2017 | 2016-07-01 → 2017-03-31 | Cultural Services and Supports | d |
| $8,500 | HUMAN SERVICES | 2015-2016 | 2016-01-01 → 2016-06-30 | Cultural group activities with youth, respite and supervision for youth to attend cultural events | d |
This vendor is not named in any recurring-justification cluster in the current evidence build.
This vendor has no qualifying vendor-scope-drift pair in the current evidence build.
Three publishing gaps in the Alberta open-data surface limit how far this deep-dive can go. Each is a real gap in current publishing, not an aspiration.
Alberta publishes contract amendments as standalone rows; the linkage back to the parent contract is not in the open data. Without it, this page cannot show a vendor's amendment-creep trajectory or aggregate amended dollars to the original award.
The sole-source register publishes the chosen vendor and a justification code, not the bidders that competed (or were dis-invited). A vendor's competitive-pressure profile cannot be reconstructed from the public record.
Contracts publish a single total dollar value. Unit prices, hours billed, materials cost, and rate cards are not in the open data, so price-per-unit comparisons across vendors and ministries are not feasible from this disclosure alone.